To content

Home Extras HR Blog Retirement at 67: solution or downfall?

Back to blog overview

HR Blog

28 October 2009

Retirement at 67: solution or downfall?

The Flemish business community is rather jealous of the Dutch, who have taken the debate about the ratio of older to younger people in the population a step further. Once again, it is the Dutch that have the nerve to face up to the grey clouds hanging over us all. What are we going to do about it? What are we doing making people work longer when we know that most people in their forties are already looking forward to retiring early? Shouldn't we be trying to motivate people rather than force them?

As far as I can see, the key question is: how do we persuade people to continue working longer of their own accord? Deliberately taking on different responsibilities than normal for longer, maybe opting for lower pay in return for more free time, but continuing to use their expertise for the company?

Early retirement was once aimed at getting young people to work. Now it is taken for granted and employees look forward to it. How have we come to this? Why do companies find it so hard to appeal to older employees' existing talents whilst also responding to their desire to ease off a bit?
Maybe you have some ideas about this.
 

Posted by: Stef Swinnen - Editor in Chief Acerta
28 Oct. 2009

React

You can only reply to this post if you are logged in as a registered user.

Log in here Register now
Profile
Talent Twister
Talent Twister
News
Events
Courses
Knowledge base
Documents
Publications
Research
Tools
Services
HR Services
HR BPO
Payroll Services
Public
Acerta International
Extras
HR Blog
HR Forum
Interviews
Web Specials
HR TV
Webcast
About Acerta
My profile